This morning I sat down and couldn’t focus. Too many thoughts swirling around in my brain; frustrations about how we are meant to deal with, and where we fit into, the current political climate. Politics today are so partisan, from our global leaders to our local leaders, the media, and our friends and family. So, here are 10 minutes on what I think about all of this, and why it needs to change.
Skip ahead to 4:30 if you wanna just straight into it, otherwise, enjoy my wordy intro.
Here are my thoughts, if you prefer to read it straight from the page:
An argument for bi-partisanship, and healthy debate
The world is becoming more partisan. And we can understand why this is happening, when you look at the consistency of global events that encourage impassioned and extreme points of view, events like financialization, the widening gap between the rich and poor, terrorism, and more than anything else, our inability to keep up with the rate at which technology is evolving, and the upheaval this creates for the job market in manufacturing, agriculture, data entry, etc, etc. This in particular because one of our very basic human needs is to feel a sense of purpose, to wake up with a place in the world, and technology is quickly displacing those who aren’t part of the technological revolution. When you feel displaced, you feel as if the current state of government, the structure of our society, doesn’t support you, and I believe this has been a significant contribution to the populism movements that we’ve witnessed recently.
As we find ourselves facing further partisanship, meaning there is less of a group mentality, and more “us vs. them,” liberals vs. conservatives, rich vs. poor, we must remember the value of discourse, of debate, of understanding the other side’s point of view, and that there is no winning in being right. If you’re right, then somebody else is wrong, and this may satisfy in the moment, but it is no way to productively move forward. In fact, it creates further divisiveness.
Encouraging debate is enormously important, there is no replacement for it. The key to debate, and what differentiates it from two parties yelling at one another, is that while half of the recipe is education, half of it is empathy; there is an inherent respect built into the process that allows each other side to share their views. Debate is not debate if you are not open to hearing what your opponent, for lack of better words, has to say, and receiving their points with a sense of openness. I believe it is a process of integrity, and we so need to preserve that.
We are all in this together, regardless of our political views, we end up under one government and as citizens, if we are to continue to live in a country that we are proud to call home, then we must work together to ensure that our rights are preserved, that our freedoms are carried forward, that the economy operates with the interest of society in mind, and that our institutions are upheld. This will not happen if we do not operate as a collective.
Several reasons stand out to me as why partisanship has grown to the state that we experience today: sensationalized news reporting that targets readers by appealing to their politics, and the average person’s shortened attention span, the sheer amount of content that is thrown at us everyday, and as a result, our penchant for reading headlines, selectively choosing publications or articles, and surrounding ourselves with people and information that are like-minded.
It bothers me a great deal that we feel encouraged to demonstrate a strong opinion for one side or another, rather than looking more carefully at the pros and cons of each side, because there are. No politician is all bad, and no politician is all good. For the record, every single politician lies, makes fake promises, and is beholden to somebody. There is simply no way around this, it is part of the political system. Becoming a political costs a lot of money, and this money often comes with a need, which may or may not be to the constituents benefit. But to get elected, the politician has to accept that money. It’s a catch-22 of the worst kind.
Thanks for reading. 🙂 Thoughts?
